A larger bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court will decide whether the live-in pair has the Right to protection.
Live-in pair has the Right to protection: After seeing different views and differences in findings by different benches. In the case of protection for couples who fled in a live-in relationship were not granted protection. A larger bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court will now decide on the above problem.
A single bench HC asked the chief justice to constitute a larger bench. A larger bench to determine whether “the court must provide protection to two people who live together. The court will decide without checking their marital status and other circumstances.”
“It seems that various court benches, from the strength of the coordinates. They have formed various opinions about the problem concerned, which cannot be easily determined”. Thus, it is appropriate to ask the chief justice to form a larger bench observes justice Anil Kshetarpal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33c4e/33c4e57e2d69703f9f283451d579841022091dd8" alt="A larger bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court will decide whether the live-in pair has the Right to protection."
He asked HC to decide when two people who lived together sought the protection of their lives and freedom is viable or not. By submitting the appropriate petition, whether the court must provide protection. The protection per se, without checking their marital status of the case.
When the court can reject their Live-in pair Right to protection, ask HC Judge
Justice Kshetarpal wants to know that if the answer to the above is negative. And on what conditions in which the court can deny their protection.
The judge also refers to various contradictory commands. One bench refuses to provide protection to a couple who were in live-in relations. And in some cases, other courts allow the protection of the pair placed the same.
“I have used the”person” expression in the first question framed, instead of using the” adult”
“I have used the”person” expression in the first question framed, instead of using the” adult” phrase. Given the fact that this court also seems to have provided protection. Also in certain cases where both applicants are not mature.
The fact that a large number of WRIT petitions submitted before this court involved this question. The advice would be free to request a greater bench for temporary help and fast disposal observed the justice while referring to a larger bench.
The judge has passed this order while hearing the petition filed by a couple about Live-in pair Right to protection from Haryana. The male applicant in this case married, but his relationship with his wife is tense. Yet, he had not divorced his wife.
Male applicants have now fled with another woman (petitioner). They want to live together, but their relationship was not accepted by their family. They hence approached HC looking for directions. Directions to protect their lives and freedom from their family and relatives.
Find the Best Divorce Lawyers in Chennai: Appellate Lawyers Office